« New Employment Laws and How They Could Affect Your Business | Main | Appellate Court Agrees With CalChamber: Rounding Policies OK in California »

November 01, 2012

NLRB Reduces Case Backlog, Cuts Age of Cases In Half

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced in mid October that it issued 341 decisions in contested cases during from October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2012. The agency issued decisions in 277 unfair labor practice cases and 64 representation cases.

The NLRB also said it cut the median age of pending cases to 108 days from 219 days – a reduction of nearly 50 percent. All Board decisions can be found on the NLRB website. Some highlights of FY2012 case production follow:

  • Mandatory arbitration: In D.R. Horton, the Board ruled that it is a violation of federal labor law to require employees to sign arbitration agreements that prohibit them from joining together in any forum to bring legal claims against the employer.
  • Lawsuits as unfair labor practices: A number of decisions, including two issued by the full Board, found that lawsuits filed by employers or unions may be unfair labor practices in certain circumstances. Federal Security Inc.; J.A. Croson Co.; Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons (Standard Drywall); Sheet Metal Workers (EP Donnelly); and Allied Mechanical Services.
  • Facebook firings: In its first look at a case involving a discharge for Facebook posts, the Board found that the particular postings that led to the discharge were not protected. However, the Board found that the employer’s “courtesy” policy was unlawfully overbroad. More such cases are pending.
  • Immigration status and back pay: In Flaum Appetizing, the Board found that employers must have good reason to raise the immigration status of employees during procedures to determine back pay awards, and cannot raise the question as a “fishing expedition” to avoid payment.
  • Successor employer obligations: In Massey Energy Company, the Board found that the company unlawfully refused to hire former unionized employees in order to avoid union obligations at a coal mine. The Board also found the company to be a single employer with its subsidiary, Mammoth Coal Company.
  • Specialty Healthcare standards: The Board applied the standards for unit determination that were clarified in its August 2011 opinion in Specialty Healthcare to several cases, including DTG Operations, Northrop Grumman Shipyard, and Odwalla, Inc


CalChamber member? Visit the HR Library pages on social media in the workplace and unions to learn more about the NLRB's activity.

Not a member? Learn about the benefits of membership.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54fc564f68833017c32fed204970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NLRB Reduces Case Backlog, Cuts Age of Cases In Half:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

CalChamber's experts analyze federal and state legislation and important court cases that affect employment law. California businesses turn to HRCalifornia for products and services to stay compliant with state and federal employment laws.
Contact Us
(800) 649-4921    |    E-mail    |    Live Chat

Connect with Us
HR Watchdog   HRCalifornia
Social Media Icons   Social Media Icons

Free HRCalifornia Resources

What's New on HRCalifornia



Disclaimer

While we may provide information about laws and regulations, the information should not be construed as legal advice. Because CalChamber does not provide legal advice, we cannot discuss the application of law to your specific circumstances.